Malaysian vs Ugandan Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Malaysian
Ugandan
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Malaysians
Ugandans
46.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
41.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
181st/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Ugandan Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,006,670 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.112 and weighted average of 46.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,998,948 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.125 and weighted average of 43.8%, a difference of 5.6%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Malaysian | Ugandan |
Minimum | 18.6% | 23.4% |
Maximum | 84.0% | 81.0% |
Range | 65.4% | 57.6% |
Mean | 47.5% | 47.4% |
Median | 46.5% | 45.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 40.1% | 38.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 52.7% | 54.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.6% | 15.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 12.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Malaysians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Mongolian (46.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (46.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (46.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants (46.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and Yugoslavian (46.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | Mexico | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.4% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 46.1 /100 | #175 | Average 46.4% |
Cajuns | 45.2 /100 | #176 | Average 46.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 43.8 /100 | #177 | Average 46.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 43.4 /100 | #178 | Average 46.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 43.0 /100 | #179 | Average 46.3% |
Mongolians | 42.0 /100 | #180 | Average 46.3% |
Malaysians | 41.8 /100 | #181 | Average 46.3% |
Yugoslavians | 38.9 /100 | #182 | Fair 46.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 38.3 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 36.9 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.2% |
Brazilians | 35.9 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.2% |
Albanians | 31.1 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.1% |
Fijians | 29.2 /100 | #187 | Fair 46.1% |
South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Shoshone (43.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Apache (43.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Central American Indian (43.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Central American (43.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | Kenya | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 44.1% |
French American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 44.1% |
German Russians | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 44.0% |
Seminole | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.0% |
Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 43.9% |
Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |