Ethiopian vs Central American Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Central American
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Ethiopians
Central Americans
43.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Central American Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,091,132 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.596 and weighted average of 43.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,046,022 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.172 and weighted average of 43.9%, a difference of 1.8%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Central American |
| Minimum | 28.9% | 24.4% |
| Maximum | 80.4% | 66.7% |
| Range | 51.5% | 42.3% |
| Mean | 46.2% | 42.7% |
| Median | 43.6% | 43.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 40.1% | 38.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.7% | 46.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Central Americans by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Nigeria (43.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Guatemalan (43.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Yuman (43.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (43.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (43.4%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Apache (43.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Shoshone (43.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Ugandan (43.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and Central American Indian (43.8%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Yuman | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Ethiopians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 43.2% |