Zimbabwean vs Chinese Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Chinese
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Zimbabweans
Chinese
10.4%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Chinese Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,187,609 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Chinese |
Minimum | 2.2% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 23.3% | 33.9% |
Range | 21.1% | 29.7% |
Mean | 10.3% | 12.1% |
Median | 9.7% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.7% | 12.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Chinese by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Ethiopian (10.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (10.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Hungary (10.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Korean (10.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Macedonian (10.4%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Italy (10.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Denmark (10.3%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chinese | 98.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 98.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Palestinians | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 97.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Austria | 97.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Macedonians | 97.8 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 97.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Zimbabweans | 97.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Ethiopians | 97.4 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 97.2 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Brazilians | 96.9 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.5% |