Uruguayan vs Chinese Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Chinese
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Uruguayans
Chinese
10.2%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Chinese Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,764,397 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 0.57%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Uruguayan | Chinese |
Minimum | 3.7% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 42.9% | 33.9% |
Range | 39.1% | 29.7% |
Mean | 14.9% | 12.1% |
Median | 11.4% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 12.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans and Chinese by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Chilean (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Afghan (10.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lebanon (10.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Europe (10.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Nicaraguan (10.2%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Italy (10.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Denmark (10.3%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Russians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Sri Lankans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.1 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Nicaraguans | 99.1 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Uruguayans | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chinese | 98.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 98.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Palestinians | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.4% |