Zimbabwean vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Chinese
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Zimbabweans
Chinese
38.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
38.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,203,596 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027 and weighted average of 38.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,804,450 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268 and weighted average of 38.6%, a difference of 0.29%.
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Chinese |
Minimum | 14.6% | 12.8% |
Maximum | 65.2% | 75.9% |
Range | 50.6% | 63.1% |
Mean | 41.4% | 40.5% |
Median | 40.1% | 39.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 36.9% | 35.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.1% | 42.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Chinese by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Hmong (38.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Cameroon (38.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Thailand (38.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Eritrea (38.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Iraqi (38.6%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Delaware (38.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Iraqi (38.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Lebanese (38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (38.7%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 38.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 99.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 38.9% |
Latvians | 99.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 38.9% |
Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 38.9% |
Ugandans | 99.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 38.9% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 38.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 99.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 38.7% |
Hmong | 99.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 38.7% |
Zimbabweans | 99.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 38.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 38.7% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 38.7% |
Iraqis | 98.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Delaware | 98.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Chinese | 98.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 98.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Lebanese | 98.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 38.6% |
Maltese | 98.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 38.5% |
Crow | 98.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 38.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 98.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 38.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 98.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 38.4% |
Hawaiians | 98.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 38.4% |