Zimbabwean vs Vietnamese Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Vietnamese
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Zimbabweans
Vietnamese
10.4%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Vietnamese Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,187,609 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,653,846 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.084 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 1.3%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Vietnamese |
Minimum | 2.2% | 3.2% |
Maximum | 23.3% | 19.9% |
Range | 21.1% | 16.7% |
Mean | 10.3% | 10.3% |
Median | 9.7% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.7% | 12.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Vietnamese by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Ethiopian (10.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (10.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Hungary (10.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Korean (10.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Macedonian (10.4%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Vietnamese are Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Moldova (10.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Romanian (10.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Norway (10.6%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 97.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Austria | 97.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Macedonians | 97.8 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 97.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Zimbabweans | 97.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Ethiopians | 97.4 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 97.2 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Brazilians | 96.9 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 96.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Tongans | 96.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 96.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 95.7 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 95.5 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Vietnamese | 95.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Romanians | 95.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Maltese | 94.8 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 10.6% |