Zimbabwean vs Choctaw Male Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Choctaw
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Choctaw
10.6%
MALE DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Choctaw Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,379 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,660,738 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 45.6%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Choctaw |
Minimum | 3.1% | 6.3% |
Maximum | 28.1% | 44.2% |
Range | 25.0% | 38.0% |
Mean | 11.3% | 23.1% |
Median | 10.2% | 22.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 19.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 27.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 6.9% |
Similar Demographics by Male Disability
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Jordan (10.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Chile (10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Guyana (10.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Poland (10.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and Bulgarian (10.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 98.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Laotians | 98.6 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 98.6 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 98.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 98.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.1 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Bulgarians | 98.1 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Sri Lankans | 97.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 97.9 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Kiowa (15.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Creek (15.5%, a difference of 0.85%), Puerto Rican (15.6%, a difference of 0.98%), Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Tsimshian (15.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 17.4% |