Uruguayan vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Chinese
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Uruguayans
Chinese
16.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
54.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,396,450 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,759,689 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.266 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 35.1%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Uruguayan | Chinese |
Minimum | 3.3% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 53.4% | 56.0% |
Range | 50.1% | 53.7% |
Mean | 18.4% | 14.3% |
Median | 14.2% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.4% | 17.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.6% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.3% | 11.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from Colombia (16.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Hungarian (16.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Afghan (16.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and South American (16.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Colombians | 67.6 /100 | #162 | Good 15.8% |
Yugoslavians | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #164 | Good 15.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 66.4 /100 | #165 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 65.4 /100 | #166 | Good 15.9% |
Costa Ricans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 16.0% |
South Americans | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 16.0% |
Uruguayans | 54.7 /100 | #169 | Average 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 16.1% |
Hungarians | 52.5 /100 | #171 | Average 16.2% |
Afghans | 52.3 /100 | #172 | Average 16.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 52.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.2% |
Scotch-Irish | 47.1 /100 | #175 | Average 16.3% |
Lebanese | 45.9 /100 | #176 | Average 16.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), Iranian (12.2%, a difference of 2.6%), Thai (11.6%, a difference of 3.1%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and Immigrants from Iran (12.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |