Uruguayan vs Jordanian Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Jordanian
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Uruguayans
Jordanians
10.2%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
78th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Jordanian Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,764,397 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,388,357 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 0.97%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Uruguayan | Jordanian |
Minimum | 3.7% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 42.9% | 19.9% |
Range | 39.1% | 16.3% |
Mean | 14.9% | 10.0% |
Median | 11.4% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans and Jordanians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Chilean (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Afghan (10.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lebanon (10.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Europe (10.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Nicaraguan (10.2%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Vietnam (10.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Mongolian (10.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Chile (10.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Latvia (10.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Croatia (10.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | France | 99.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Laotians | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Mongolians | 99.4 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Latvians | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Russians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Sri Lankans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.1 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Nicaraguans | 99.1 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Uruguayans | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.3% |