Uruguayan vs Chippewa Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Chippewa
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Uruguayans
Chippewa
10.2%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Chippewa Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,764,397 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,987,125 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 46.2%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Uruguayan | Chippewa |
Minimum | 3.7% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 42.9% | 56.1% |
Range | 39.1% | 54.1% |
Mean | 14.9% | 21.1% |
Median | 11.4% | 18.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 24.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 9.9% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Chilean (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Afghan (10.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lebanon (10.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Europe (10.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Nicaraguan (10.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Russians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Sri Lankans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.1 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Nicaraguans | 99.1 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Uruguayans | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chinese | 98.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 98.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Apache (14.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Arapaho (15.1%, a difference of 0.66%), Potawatomi (14.8%, a difference of 1.4%), Comanche (14.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and Black/African American (14.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.6% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 14.7% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 14.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 14.9% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.0% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.1% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 15.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 15.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |