Ugandan vs Brazilian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Ugandan
Brazilian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Ugandans
Brazilians
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Brazilian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,396 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,890,507 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.45%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | Brazilian |
Minimum | 1.4% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 14.2% | 13.4% |
Range | 12.8% | 11.1% |
Mean | 5.7% | 6.1% |
Median | 5.5% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 6.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Brazilians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Chilean (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Peru (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cameroon (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Sudanese (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |