Ugandan vs Kenyan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Ugandan
Kenyan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Ugandans
Kenyans
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Kenyan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,396 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,175,436 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.464 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.87%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | Kenyan |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 14.2% | 13.2% |
| Range | 12.8% | 11.9% |
| Mean | 5.7% | 6.2% |
| Median | 5.5% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Kenyans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Chilean (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Immigrants from El Salvador (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Salvadoran (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Somalia (5.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lebanon (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Denmark (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |