Ugandan vs South American Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Ugandan
South American
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Ugandans
South Americans
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs South American Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,396 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,855,959 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.489 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.24%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | South American |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.63% |
| Maximum | 14.2% | 9.5% |
| Range | 12.8% | 8.9% |
| Mean | 5.7% | 5.2% |
| Median | 5.5% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and South Americans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Chilean (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |