Ugandan vs New Zealander Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Ugandan
New Zealander
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Ugandans
New Zealanders
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs New Zealander Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,396 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,904,660 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 14.2% | 17.7% |
| Range | 12.8% | 16.2% |
| Mean | 5.7% | 6.6% |
| Median | 5.5% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and New Zealanders by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are South American (5.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.33%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Romania (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Kenya (5.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Serbia (5.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from South America (5.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (5.8%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |