Sri Lankan vs Brazilian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Brazilian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Sri Lankans
Brazilians
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Brazilian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,321,822 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.442 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,890,507 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.78%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sri Lankan | Brazilian |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 20.4% | 13.4% |
| Range | 17.8% | 11.1% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 6.1% |
| Median | 5.5% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Brazilians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Uganda (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (5.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Laotian (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Peru (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cameroon (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Sudanese (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |