Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Brazilian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Brazilian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Brazilians
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Brazilian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,631,986 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sierra Leone and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,890,507 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sierra Leone | Brazilian |
Minimum | 2.2% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 12.2% | 13.4% |
Range | 10.0% | 11.1% |
Mean | 5.8% | 6.1% |
Median | 5.7% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 6.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Brazilians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone are Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cameroon (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Sudanese (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (5.7%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |