Iroquois vs Potawatomi Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Iroquois
Potawatomi
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Iroquois
Potawatomi
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Potawatomi Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,272,935 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.675 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,764,729 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320 and weighted average of 7.3%, a difference of 3.8%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Potawatomi |
Minimum | 3.0% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 40.9% | 23.9% |
Range | 37.9% | 20.7% |
Mean | 12.5% | 10.6% |
Median | 9.2% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 12.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Potawatomi by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Chippewa (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Micronesia (7.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Apache (7.4%, a difference of 0.81%), Osage (7.4%, a difference of 0.95%), American (7.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Dominican (7.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and Ottawa (7.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 7.1% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 7.2% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 7.2% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 7.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 7.3% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 7.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 7.4% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 7.4% |