Inupiat vs Polish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Inupiat
Polish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Inupiat
Poles
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Polish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,327,130 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.331 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,051,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 10.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat | Polish |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 18.0% | 47.7% |
| Range | 16.9% | 45.5% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 9.1% |
| Median | 5.0% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Inupiat by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Jordanian (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Brazil (5.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Poles by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |