Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Bhutanese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Bhutanese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Bhutanese
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Bhutanese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,631,986 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sierra Leone and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,305,094 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.17%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sierra Leone | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 2.2% | 0.28% |
Maximum | 12.2% | 14.0% |
Range | 10.0% | 13.8% |
Mean | 5.8% | 6.2% |
Median | 5.7% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone and Bhutanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone are Immigrants from Denmark (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Kenyan (5.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (5.8%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Denmark (5.8%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |