Immigrants from Kenya vs Icelander Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kenya
Icelander
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Kenya
Icelanders
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kenya vs Icelander Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,037,313 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kenya and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.162 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,642,692 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.148 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 1.8%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Kenya | Icelander |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.47% |
| Maximum | 15.8% | 16.5% |
| Range | 14.6% | 16.1% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 6.9% |
| Median | 5.8% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kenya and Icelanders by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kenya are Immigrants from Romania (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Uruguayan (5.8%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |