Immigrants from Israel vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Chickasaw
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Chickasaw
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
19.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Chickasaw Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,717,487 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,184,773 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 4.6%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 8.9% | 20.0% |
| Range | 7.8% | 18.2% |
| Mean | 5.2% | 6.1% |
| Median | 5.0% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Iroquois (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Alsatians | 23.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.3% |
| Tsimshian | 23.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
| Hawaiians | 22.2 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
| Soviet Union | 21.7 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 20.8 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
| Iroquois | 20.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 20.3 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 19.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 18.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
| Creek | 15.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 13.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.4% |
| Koreans | 13.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.4% |
| Choctaw | 12.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.4% |
| Ottawa | 11.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from France (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |