Immigrants from Belgium vs Taiwanese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belgium
Taiwanese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Belgium
Taiwanese
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
61st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belgium vs Taiwanese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,707,151 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,722,995 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 0.81%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belgium | Taiwanese |
Minimum | 0.96% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 40.5% | 13.3% |
Range | 39.5% | 11.0% |
Mean | 8.1% | 5.7% |
Median | 5.9% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 6.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belgium and Taiwanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belgium are Immigrants from Spain (5.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (5.6%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Jordanian (5.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Luxembourger (5.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |