Immigrants vs Houma Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,239,598 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Houma within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.465. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 5.3 Houma.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Houma communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 53.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,943 compared to $72,093, a difference of 38.6%), and median household income ($85,818 compared to $62,575, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,168 compared to $50,547, a difference of 7.2%), median earnings ($46,478 compared to $38,949, a difference of 19.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,201 compared to $44,356, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 85.3%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 68.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 60.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 37.7%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 42.4%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.0%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.8% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.45%), family households (66.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.66%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 38.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 24.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.58%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 96.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 90.8%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 85.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 74.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 69.0%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.9%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 18.6%).