Austrian vs Houma Community Comparison
COMPARE
Austrian
Houma
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Austrians
Houma
8,605
SOCIAL INDEX
83.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
60th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Houma Integration in Austrian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,430,027 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Austrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.930. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Austrians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.599% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Austrians corresponds to an increase of 598.9 Houma.
Austrian vs Houma Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Austrian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,692 compared to $72,093, a difference of 50.8%), median family income ($111,306 compared to $76,188, a difference of 46.1%), and median household income ($91,339 compared to $62,575, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,898 compared to $44,356, a difference of 17.0%), median male earnings ($59,359 compared to $50,547, a difference of 17.4%), and median earnings ($49,501 compared to $38,949, a difference of 27.1%).
Income Metric | Austrian | Houma |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $48,116 | Tragic $32,996 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $111,306 | Tragic $76,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,339 | Tragic $62,575 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $49,501 | Tragic $38,949 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,359 | Tragic $50,547 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,923 | Tragic $30,343 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,898 | Tragic $44,356 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $101,842 | Tragic $77,044 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $108,692 | Tragic $72,093 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,470 | Tragic $44,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 38.7% |
Austrian vs Houma Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Austrian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 86.7%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 78.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.8% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 76.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 34.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 40.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 44.4%).
Poverty Metric | Austrian | Houma |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 18.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 20.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 26.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 24.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 26.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 23.5% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.4% | Tragic 33.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Tragic 26.7% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.7% | Tragic 43.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 16.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 16.5% |
Austrian vs Houma Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Austrian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 78.2%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 43.7%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Austrian | Houma |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 21.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.7% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.8% |
Austrian vs Houma Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Austrian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 11.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Austrian | Houma |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.6% | Tragic 59.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.5% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 81.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.7% | Tragic 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.0% | Tragic 74.1% |
Austrian vs Houma Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Austrian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 50.0%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 38.1%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Austrian | Houma |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.6% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 13.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 31.0% | Tragic 46.6% |
Austrian vs Houma Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 37.8%), no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 29.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 29.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Austrian | Houma |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 11.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.3% | Tragic 88.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.4% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 4.9% |
Austrian vs Houma Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Austrian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 132.7%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 119.4%), and master's degree (16.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 111.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Austrian | Houma |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Tragic 92.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Tragic 87.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 83.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.0% | Tragic 81.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.7% | Tragic 75.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.8% | Tragic 47.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.8% | Tragic 41.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.1% | Tragic 28.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.6% | Tragic 21.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 7.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 2.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 0.96% |
Austrian vs Houma Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Austrian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 67.7%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 60.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 58.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 16.3%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 22.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 23.9%).
Disability Metric | Austrian | Houma |
Disability | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 17.1% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Poor 5.7% | Tragic 9.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 9.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.1% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 32.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.0% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 3.0% |