Chilean vs Houma Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chilean
Houma
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chileans
Houma
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Houma Integration in Chilean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,877,720 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.399. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.301% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 301.3 Houma.
Chilean vs Houma Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $72,093, a difference of 47.9%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 47.0%), and median household income ($90,605 compared to $62,575, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $50,547, a difference of 12.7%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $44,356, a difference of 19.9%), and median earnings ($48,504 compared to $38,949, a difference of 24.5%).
Income Metric | Chilean | Houma |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,459 | Tragic $32,996 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,429 | Tragic $76,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,605 | Tragic $62,575 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,504 | Tragic $38,949 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,973 | Tragic $50,547 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,757 | Tragic $30,343 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,185 | Tragic $44,356 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,900 | Tragic $77,044 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,611 | Tragic $72,093 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,957 | Tragic $44,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Tragic 38.7% |
Chilean vs Houma Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 96.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 77.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 74.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 28.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 29.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 31.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chilean | Houma |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 18.4% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Tragic 20.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 26.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 24.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 26.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 23.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Tragic 33.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 26.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 43.5% |
Married Couples | Excellent 4.9% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Tragic 16.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 16.5% |
Chilean vs Houma Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 78.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 41.3%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 8.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Chilean | Houma |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 21.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Chilean vs Houma Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chilean | Houma |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 59.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 81.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 74.1% |
Chilean vs Houma Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 51.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 31.8%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.86%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chilean | Houma |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 13.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.7% | Tragic 46.6% |
Chilean vs Houma Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 30.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 22.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 15.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chilean | Houma |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Tragic 11.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.2% | Tragic 88.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.1% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Chilean vs Houma Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 137.2%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 124.6%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 114.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.66%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.72%).
Education Level Metric | Chilean | Houma |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Tragic 96.8% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Tragic 92.3% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Tragic 87.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.7% | Tragic 83.7% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Tragic 81.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 75.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Tragic 47.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.0% | Tragic 41.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.4% | Tragic 28.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.2% | Tragic 21.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 7.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 2.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 0.96% |
Chilean vs Houma Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 82.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 68.2%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.3%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 27.8%).
Disability Metric | Chilean | Houma |
Disability | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 17.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 9.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 9.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 32.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 3.0% |