Immigrants vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 366,085,333 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.834. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 2.3 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 12.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,201 compared to $51,224, a difference of 3.9%), and median family income ($100,962 compared to $103,273, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($46,478 compared to $46,658, a difference of 0.39%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,423 compared to $95,070, a difference of 0.69%), and median household income ($85,818 compared to $84,965, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 38.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 31.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 0.040%), single female poverty (21.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.2%), unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.4%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and currently married (45.8% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 2.0%), family households (66.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 48.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 72.0%), high school diploma (85.8% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and ged/equivalency (82.6% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (36.7% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 0.83%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 25.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.19%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.0%).