Estonian vs Houma Community Comparison
COMPARE
Estonian
Houma
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Estonians
Houma
8,730
SOCIAL INDEX
84.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
54th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Houma Integration in Estonian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,130,627 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Houma within Estonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.092. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Estonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Estonians corresponds to an increase of 46.9 Houma.
Estonian vs Houma Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Estonian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,220 compared to $72,093, a difference of 58.4%), per capita income ($51,875 compared to $32,996, a difference of 57.2%), and median family income ($118,013 compared to $76,188, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,523 compared to $44,356, a difference of 16.2%), median male earnings ($61,710 compared to $50,547, a difference of 22.1%), and median earnings ($51,772 compared to $38,949, a difference of 32.9%).
Income Metric | Estonian | Houma |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,875 | Tragic $32,996 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $118,013 | Tragic $76,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,930 | Tragic $62,575 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,772 | Tragic $38,949 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,710 | Tragic $50,547 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,106 | Tragic $30,343 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,523 | Tragic $44,356 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $107,269 | Tragic $77,044 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $114,220 | Tragic $72,093 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,926 | Tragic $44,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 38.7% |
Estonian vs Houma Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Estonian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 94.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 86.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 85.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 26.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 43.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 49.8%).
Poverty Metric | Estonian | Houma |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 18.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.5% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 20.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 26.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Tragic 24.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 26.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Tragic 23.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.7% | Tragic 33.8% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.2% | Tragic 26.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 43.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 16.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 16.5% |
Estonian vs Houma Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Estonian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 75.9%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 38.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Estonian | Houma |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.7% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 21.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.3% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.6% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.8% |
Estonian vs Houma Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Estonian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 5.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Estonian | Houma |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Tragic 59.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.7% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.5% | Tragic 81.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.9% | Tragic 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 74.1% |
Estonian vs Houma Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Estonian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 59.5%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 47.7%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.10 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.4%), family households (62.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and currently married (48.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 5.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Estonian | Houma |
Family Households | Tragic 62.9% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.7% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.10 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.2% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 13.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.2% | Tragic 46.6% |
Estonian vs Houma Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Estonian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 22.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Estonian | Houma |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Tragic 11.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Tragic 88.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.6% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Estonian vs Houma Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Estonian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 168.7%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 163.9%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 137.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Estonian | Houma |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 92.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.3% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 87.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.2% | Tragic 83.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.6% | Tragic 81.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.6% | Tragic 75.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.6% | Tragic 47.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 65.0% | Tragic 41.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.5% | Tragic 28.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.6% | Tragic 21.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 2.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 0.96% |
Estonian vs Houma Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Estonian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 75.9%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 66.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.6%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age over 75 (45.6% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 23.2%).
Disability Metric | Estonian | Houma |
Disability | Average 11.7% | Tragic 17.1% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females | Excellent 12.0% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Tragic 9.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.8% | Tragic 9.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.4% | Tragic 32.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.6% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 3.0% |