Celtic vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison
COMPARE
Celtic
Immigrants from Cuba
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Celtics
Immigrants from Cuba
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,627
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
214th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Cuba Integration in Celtic Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,352,202 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to a decrease of 12.3 Immigrants from Cuba.
Celtic vs Immigrants from Cuba Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $44,735, a difference of 35.5%), median family income ($101,139 compared to $78,249, a difference of 29.2%), and per capita income ($43,621 compared to $34,910, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $50,374, a difference of 0.14%), median female earnings ($38,283 compared to $33,291, a difference of 15.0%), and median earnings ($45,732 compared to $38,426, a difference of 19.0%).
Income Metric | Celtic | Immigrants from Cuba |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,621 | Tragic $34,910 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,139 | Tragic $78,249 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,193 | Tragic $68,461 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,732 | Tragic $38,426 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,242 | Tragic $43,461 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,283 | Tragic $33,291 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,447 | Tragic $50,374 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,241 | Tragic $76,701 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,896 | Tragic $80,662 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,608 | Tragic $44,735 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Celtic vs Immigrants from Cuba Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 90.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 82.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 80.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 2.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and single female poverty (22.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 7.1%).
Poverty Metric | Celtic | Immigrants from Cuba |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 14.6% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 11.3% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 17.9% | Tragic 19.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.4% | Tragic 18.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Tragic 18.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 17.0% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.7% | Fair 21.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Average 16.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.9% | Tragic 30.1% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 17.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 19.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 20.8% |
Celtic vs Immigrants from Cuba Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 25.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Celtic | Immigrants from Cuba |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.7% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.5% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Celtic vs Immigrants from Cuba Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 36.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Celtic | Immigrants from Cuba |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.8% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Tragic 72.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.8% | Exceptional 83.7% |
Celtic vs Immigrants from Cuba Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 24.5%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 22.7%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.63%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.8%), and family households (63.8% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 7.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Celtic | Immigrants from Cuba |
Family Households | Tragic 63.8% | Exceptional 68.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Tragic 26.8% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.3% | Tragic 44.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Exceptional 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 7.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.8% | Tragic 43.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Tragic 41.5% |
Celtic vs Immigrants from Cuba Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.85%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 7.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Celtic | Immigrants from Cuba |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.1% | Exceptional 91.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Average 55.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Poor 18.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Celtic vs Immigrants from Cuba Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 72.8%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 60.2%), and master's degree (14.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Celtic | Immigrants from Cuba |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 95.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 93.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 93.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Tragic 92.2% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.7% | Tragic 88.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 87.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Tragic 83.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 86.7% | Tragic 80.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.9% | Tragic 55.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Tragic 50.7% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Tragic 39.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Tragic 30.3% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.8% | Tragic 10.9% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.2% |
Celtic vs Immigrants from Cuba Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 46.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 41.9%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.95%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.1%).
Disability Metric | Celtic | Immigrants from Cuba |
Disability | Tragic 13.1% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 13.3% | Fair 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.2% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.2% | Fair 47.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Good 17.1% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |