Immigrants from Oceania vs Egyptian Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Egyptian
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Egyptians
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
79.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
78.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Egyptian Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,351,716 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.803 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,383,478 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.175 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.11%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Egyptian |
Minimum | 1.2% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 29.1% | 9.8% |
Range | 27.9% | 8.6% |
Mean | 7.9% | 4.7% |
Median | 5.5% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 5.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Egyptians by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 74.9 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
South Africans | 70.8 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 70.0 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 69.6 /100 | #156 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Russia | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 5.2% |