Immigrants from Micronesia vs Egyptian Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
Egyptian
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Egyptians
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
66.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
78.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Egyptian Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,521,067 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.711 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,383,478 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.175 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.88%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Micronesia | Egyptian |
Minimum | 0.30% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 29.1% | 9.8% |
Range | 28.8% | 8.6% |
Mean | 7.4% | 4.7% |
Median | 5.4% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 5.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia and Egyptians by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Immigrants from Spain (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Pakistan (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Potawatomi (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Albanian (5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Russia (5.2%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 74.9 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
South Africans | 70.8 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 70.0 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 69.6 /100 | #156 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Russia | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 5.2% |
Albanians | 68.3 /100 | #158 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 66.9 /100 | #159 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Spain | 66.8 /100 | #160 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 66.7 /100 | #161 | Good 5.2% |
Potawatomi | 65.9 /100 | #162 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 64.3 /100 | #163 | Good 5.2% |
Bangladeshis | 64.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.2% |