Immigrants from Oceania vs Creek Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Creek
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Creek
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
79.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
15.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Creek Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,351,716 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.803 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,704,441 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 4.7%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Creek |
Minimum | 1.2% | 0.90% |
Maximum | 29.1% | 16.7% |
Range | 27.9% | 15.8% |
Mean | 7.9% | 6.1% |
Median | 5.5% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 8.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 3.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Korean (5.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.4%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and Choctaw (5.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Soviet Union | 21.7 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 20.8 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
Iroquois | 20.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 20.3 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 19.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 18.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Creek | 15.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 13.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.4% |
Koreans | 13.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.4% |
Choctaw | 12.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.4% |
Ottawa | 11.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.4% |
Uruguayans | 11.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.4% |
Samoans | 10.6 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.4% |
Seminole | 10.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.4% |