Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from China Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from China
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Immigrants from China
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
79.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
75.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from China Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,351,716 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.803 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,254,097 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.32%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 1.2% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 29.1% | 7.7% |
Range | 27.9% | 6.0% |
Mean | 7.9% | 5.1% |
Median | 5.5% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 5.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 1.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from China by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Italy (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Greece (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 74.9 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
South Africans | 70.8 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 70.0 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 69.6 /100 | #156 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Russia | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 5.2% |
Albanians | 68.3 /100 | #158 | Good 5.2% |