Immigrants from Oceania vs Celtic Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Celtic
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Celtics
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
79.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Celtic Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,351,716 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.803 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,426,082 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.430 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 4.5%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Celtic |
Minimum | 1.2% | 0.40% |
Maximum | 29.1% | 19.4% |
Range | 27.9% | 19.0% |
Mean | 7.9% | 6.3% |
Median | 5.5% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 8.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 3.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Canada (4.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Nepal (4.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Scotland (4.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from North America (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Icelanders | 98.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Bhutanese | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 98.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Canada | 98.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 98.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Celtics | 98.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Hungarians | 98.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Cubans | 98.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Tlingit-Haida | 98.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Osage | 98.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 4.9% |
German Russians | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 4.9% |