Ute vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Disability
COMPARE
Ute
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Ute
Immigrants from Oceania
12.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
14.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
61.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,657,679 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,480,731 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 2.1%.
![Ute vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/female-disability/ute-vs-immigrants-from-oceania-female-disability-chart.webp)
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 7.1% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 35.7% | 48.6% |
Range | 28.7% | 46.4% |
Mean | 15.9% | 15.8% |
Median | 13.7% | 13.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.5% | 16.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Disability
Demographics Similar to Ute by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Swiss (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Thailand (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Mexican (12.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and Panamanian (12.4%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Grenada | 20.5 /100 | #205 | Fair 12.4% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 20.2 /100 | #206 | Fair 12.4% |
Croatians | 20.2 /100 | #207 | Fair 12.4% |
Basques | 17.5 /100 | #208 | Poor 12.4% |
Mexicans | 15.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 12.4% |
Swiss | 14.9 /100 | #210 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 14.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 12.4% |
Ute | 14.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 12.4% |
Panamanians | 13.5 /100 | #214 | Poor 12.4% |
Samoans | 13.4 /100 | #215 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 13.3 /100 | #216 | Poor 12.4% |
British | 12.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 12.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 12.5 /100 | #218 | Poor 12.4% |
Europeans | 12.1 /100 | #219 | Poor 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Czech (12.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Guatemalan (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Lithuanian (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Guyanese (12.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 72.4 /100 | #158 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Central America | 67.7 /100 | #159 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 66.0 /100 | #160 | Good 12.1% |
Guyanese | 64.7 /100 | #161 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 64.3 /100 | #162 | Good 12.1% |
Guatemalans | 63.8 /100 | #163 | Good 12.1% |
Czechs | 63.6 /100 | #164 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 61.8 /100 | #165 | Good 12.1% |
Lithuanians | 59.5 /100 | #166 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 59.0 /100 | #167 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 58.8 /100 | #168 | Average 12.2% |
Lebanese | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 12.2% |
Maltese | 57.0 /100 | #170 | Average 12.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 56.3 /100 | #171 | Average 12.2% |
Haitians | 51.9 /100 | #172 | Average 12.2% |