Ugandan vs Immigrants from Thailand Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ugandan
Immigrants from Thailand
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Ugandans
Immigrants from Thailand
14.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
15.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Thailand Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,995,237 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133 and weighted average of 14.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,905,343 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 3.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | Immigrants from Thailand |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 30.6% | 44.1% |
| Range | 29.3% | 42.3% |
| Mean | 13.6% | 17.6% |
| Median | 13.1% | 16.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.8% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Immigrants from Thailand by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Uruguay (14.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Spaniard (13.9%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Western Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.84%), Hmong (13.9%, a difference of 0.89%), and Immigrants from Kenya (13.9%, a difference of 0.90%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |