Tongan vs Bulgarian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Tongan
Bulgarian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Tongans
Bulgarians
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tongan vs Bulgarian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,377,778 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,529,625 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.691 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 0.030%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tongan | Bulgarian |
Minimum | 4.0% | 5.0% |
Maximum | 45.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 41.5% | 95.0% |
Mean | 19.1% | 22.4% |
Median | 18.2% | 18.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.3% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.6% | 22.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 16.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 16.5% |
Demographics Similar to Tongans and Bulgarians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Jordanian (18.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Croatia (18.9%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Jordanian (18.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Croatia (18.9%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |