Swedish vs Burmese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Swedish
Burmese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Swedes
Burmese
7.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Burmese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 535,382,987 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.589 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,380,335 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066 and weighted average of 7.3%, a difference of 2.8%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swedish | Burmese |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 0.76% |
| Maximum | 81.3% | 29.5% |
| Range | 79.6% | 28.8% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 6.5% |
| Median | 6.5% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.9% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.6% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Swedes and Burmese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Iranian (7.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (7.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Singapore (7.1%, a difference of 0.34%), Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and Latvian (7.1%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Croatian (7.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Cypriot (7.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Scotland (7.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |