Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Immigrants from China
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Immigrants from China
20.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 496,899,151 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 49.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 1.7% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 24.4% |
Range | 98.3% | 23.3% |
Mean | 28.3% | 12.0% |
Median | 21.9% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.5% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.3% | 14.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.8% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.2% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.1% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (20.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Comanche (20.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Belizean (20.2%, a difference of 0.43%), Barbadian (20.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and Bangladeshi (20.0%, a difference of 0.57%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.2% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 20.2% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.2% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |