Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from China Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Immigrants from China
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Immigrants from China
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
67.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
49.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
176th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from China Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,337,784 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 27.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,380,554 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.285 and weighted average of 27.4%, a difference of 0.41%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 4.1% |
| Maximum | 58.3% | 41.6% |
| Range | 55.4% | 37.5% |
| Mean | 29.4% | 26.7% |
| Median | 28.2% | 27.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.8% | 24.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.4% | 30.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Immigrants from China by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Alaskan Athabascan (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are White/Caucasian (27.4%, a difference of 0.010%), British (27.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Ugandan (27.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American (27.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Argentina (27.5%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
| Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
| Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
| Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 60.9 /100 | #168 | Good 27.5% |
| Seminole | 56.9 /100 | #169 | Average 27.5% |
| Cherokee | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 27.5% |
| Blackfeet | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 27.5% |
| Israelis | 53.9 /100 | #172 | Average 27.5% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 52.2 /100 | #173 | Average 27.5% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 27.4% |
| British | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 27.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 49.6 /100 | #176 | Average 27.4% |
| Ugandans | 49.2 /100 | #177 | Average 27.4% |
| Spanish Americans | 48.9 /100 | #178 | Average 27.4% |