Subsaharan African vs Yup'ik Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Yup'ik
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Yup'ik
20.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Yup'ik Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 496,899,151 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,851,220 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305 and weighted average of 25.8%, a difference of 28.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Subsaharan African | Yup'ik |
Minimum | 1.7% | 7.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 75.0% |
Range | 98.3% | 67.9% |
Mean | 28.3% | 30.5% |
Median | 21.9% | 25.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.5% | 16.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.3% | 43.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.8% | 27.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.2% | 17.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.1% | 17.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (20.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Comanche (20.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Belizean (20.2%, a difference of 0.43%), Barbadian (20.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and Bangladeshi (20.0%, a difference of 0.57%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.2% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 20.2% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.2% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.3% |
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Sioux (25.6%, a difference of 0.93%), Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Crow (26.4%, a difference of 2.1%), Pueblo (25.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and Menominee (25.0%, a difference of 3.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |