Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Immigrants from China
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Immigrants from China
31.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,583,448 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 31.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 135.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 11.0% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 24.4% |
Range | 89.0% | 23.3% |
Mean | 46.3% | 12.0% |
Median | 37.8% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 26.4% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 60.8% | 14.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 34.5% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.2% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.7% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Lumbee (30.7%, a difference of 2.9%), Puerto Rican (32.7%, a difference of 3.4%), Navajo (30.5%, a difference of 3.7%), Immigrants from Yemen (29.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and Pima (28.2%, a difference of 12.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 30.5% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 30.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 31.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 32.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |