Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from China Family Households
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Immigrants from China
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Immigrants from China
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from China Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,715 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 62.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,596,066 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171 and weighted average of 64.7%, a difference of 4.3%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 32.6% | 36.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 67.4% | 63.2% |
Mean | 62.5% | 66.8% |
Median | 61.7% | 67.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 58.0% | 62.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.6% | 74.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 11.3% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Scotland (64.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Basque (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jamaica (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |
Basques | 85.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 84.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 64.7% |
Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 64.7% |
Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |