Spanish vs Osage Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Spanish
Osage
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Spanish
Osage
16.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
28.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish vs Osage Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 414,340,286 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,492,643 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 9.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish | Osage |
Minimum | 2.9% | 6.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 67.2% |
Range | 97.1% | 60.5% |
Mean | 34.8% | 21.1% |
Median | 24.1% | 19.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.8% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.7% | 24.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 29.9% | 10.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.6% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.4% | 11.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Spanish by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish are Aleut (16.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (16.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from the Azores (16.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and Celtic (17.0%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Morocco | 34.6 /100 | #187 | Fair 16.8% |
Arabs | 34.5 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Demographics Similar to Osage by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Cree (18.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |