Spanish American vs Subsaharan African Female Poverty
COMPARE
Spanish American
Subsaharan African
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Spanish Americans
Sub-Saharan Africans
16.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
284th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American vs Subsaharan African Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,161,919 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish Americans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.664 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,469,907 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 2.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.38% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 69.8% |
Range | 98.6% | 69.4% |
Mean | 20.4% | 20.8% |
Median | 15.6% | 16.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.5% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.0% | 22.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.5% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.0% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.8% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish Americans and Sub-Saharan Africans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish Americans are Immigrants from Cuba (16.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Comanche (16.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Haiti (16.1%, a difference of 0.13%), West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and Vietnamese (16.1%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.69%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |