Bermudan vs Subsaharan African Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bermudan
Subsaharan African
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Bermudans
Sub-Saharan Africans
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
5.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bermudan vs Subsaharan African Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,716,155 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.318 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,469,907 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 9.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bermudan | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 3.1% | 0.38% |
Maximum | 30.0% | 69.8% |
Range | 26.9% | 69.4% |
Mean | 12.3% | 20.8% |
Median | 12.6% | 16.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.6% | 22.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 12.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bermudans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.69%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |