Spanish American vs Immigrants from El Salvador Female Poverty
COMPARE
Spanish American
Immigrants from El Salvador
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Spanish Americans
Immigrants from El Salvador
16.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
284th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American vs Immigrants from El Salvador Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,161,919 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish Americans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.664 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,675,141 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.715 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 3.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American | Immigrants from El Salvador |
Minimum | 1.4% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 98.6% | 96.7% |
Mean | 20.4% | 17.2% |
Median | 15.6% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.5% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.0% | 18.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.5% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.0% | 11.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.8% | 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish Americans and Immigrants from El Salvador by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish Americans are Immigrants from Cuba (16.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Comanche (16.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Haiti (16.1%, a difference of 0.13%), West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and Vietnamese (16.1%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.49%), Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.85%), and Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |