Marshallese vs Subsaharan African Female Poverty
COMPARE
Marshallese
Subsaharan African
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Marshallese
Sub-Saharan Africans
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
5.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Subsaharan African Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,760,991 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.288 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,469,907 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 9.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Marshallese | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 6.9% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 21.1% | 69.8% |
| Range | 14.2% | 69.4% |
| Mean | 14.6% | 20.8% |
| Median | 14.4% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.5% | 22.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 12.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Marshallese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.69%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |