Immigrants from Ghana vs Subsaharan African Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ghana
Subsaharan African
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ghana
Sub-Saharan Africans
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ghana vs Subsaharan African Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,796,197 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.152 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,469,907 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 2.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ghana | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 0.90% | 0.38% |
Maximum | 43.0% | 69.8% |
Range | 42.1% | 69.4% |
Mean | 14.3% | 20.8% |
Median | 13.3% | 16.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 22.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ghana and Sub-Saharan Africans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (15.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (15.4%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.79%), Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.93%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |