Immigrants from India vs Chickasaw Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 429,262,972 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.267 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,342,221 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 59.1%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from India	Chickasaw
Minimum	0.29%	1.7%
Maximum	10.9%	17.6%
Range	10.6%	16.0%
Mean	2.9%	7.8%
Median	2.7%	7.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	2.1%	5.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	3.5%	9.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	1.4%	4.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	1.6%	3.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	1.6%	3.3%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from India by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from India are Chinese (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 2.1%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.7%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| India	100.0 /100 \| #1	Exceptional 3.6%
Chinese	100.0 /100 \| #2	Exceptional 3.6%
Norwegians	100.0 /100 \| #3	Exceptional 3.7%
Slovenes	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 3.8%
Swedes	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 3.9%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 3.9%
Latvians	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 3.9%
Thais	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 3.9%
Croatians	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 3.9%
Carpatho Rusyns	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 3.9%
Lithuanians	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 4.0%
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 4.0%
Czechs	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 4.0%
Slovaks	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 4.0%
Poles	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 4.0%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Somali (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| South America	3.1 /100 \| #237	Tragic 5.7%
Cherokee	2.7 /100 \| #238	Tragic 5.8%
Venezuelans	2.7 /100 \| #239	Tragic 5.8%
Fijians	2.5 /100 \| #240	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Panama	2.5 /100 \| #241	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	2.4 /100 \| #242	Tragic 5.8%
Somalis	2.3 /100 \| #243	Tragic 5.8%
Chickasaw	2.3 /100 \| #244	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	2.1 /100 \| #245	Tragic 5.8%
Immigrants \| Venezuela	1.8 /100 \| #246	Tragic 5.8%
Iraqis	1.4 /100 \| #247	Tragic 5.9%
Cree	1.2 /100 \| #248	Tragic 5.9%
Tsimshian	1.1 /100 \| #249	Tragic 5.9%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	1.1 /100 \| #250	Tragic 5.9%
Immigrants \| Ghana	1.0 /100 \| #251	Tragic 5.9%