Czech vs Canadian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Czech
Canadian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Czechs
Canadians
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
46.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
45.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
176th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Canadian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,282,128 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 428,352,495 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.416 and weighted average of 21.1%, a difference of 0.080%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Canadian |
Minimum | 6.8% | 13.6% |
Maximum | 80.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 74.1% | 86.4% |
Mean | 29.6% | 39.9% |
Median | 25.3% | 32.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.5% | 24.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.2% | 53.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.7% | 28.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.3% | 22.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.3% | 21.7% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Canadians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and British (21.1%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.040%), British (21.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and European (21.1%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |